Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Legal Herald - THE LAW AND YOU

Sophie Delezio Driver Pleads Guilty

August 30th 2006 08:52
Earlier this year, a 5-year-old girl was in her stroller at a pedestrian crossing at Seaforth when an elderly driver hit her with his car. She remained in a medically induced coma for 10 days and several weeks in the intensive care unit as the nation prayed for her survival.

An 80-year-old man from Frenchs Forest today pleaded guilty to dangerous driving occasioning bodily harm to the little girl we have come to know and love as Sophie Delezio.

Little Sophie first caught our attention in December 2003 after she experienced horrific burns to over 80% of her body. She had been hit by a car and trapped under it whilst at a day-care centre in Fairlight. Not only did Sophie lose both her legs, but also several fingers, an ear and most of her hair.


The person responsible was again, an elderly driver. But he was cleared of negligent driving because medical experts found the man had experienced a seizure which caused him to lose control of his car.

Sophie’s story has prompted much public debate about elderly drivers on our roads. Should there be an age limit? Should there be more frequent mandatory testing of elderly drivers? Should they be driving at all? Are we being discriminatory?

The NSW government has announced that it will investigate the possibility of reducing the age for mandatory medical checks. Currently, the checks regularly occur for those who are 80 and over. But is this enough?
87
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cinico

August 30th 2006 09:27
They should introduce frequent mandatory tests for those over say 60. They don't let babies drive because they have little co-ordination and poor reflexes (amongst other reasons!!) the same should be applied for the elderly. It's not discrimantory - it's common sense. They've introduced alot of rules for P platers and are tough on young drivers, why should any other driver be any different?

Comment by Legally Brunette

August 30th 2006 11:31
Good point. As a P-plater, I think the rules are pretty tough so why not make them tough for everybody? It will keep our roads safer for everyone on the road.

Comment by charles

August 30th 2006 14:22
I also agree that there should be mandatory tests for elderly drivers - set at around 67 . People in their early 60's can hardly be deemed old these days, and many people only retire at 65 or thereabouts.

Equally as important are those with a medical condition that affects their driving should be subjected to regular testing.


Charles.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
3 Posts
2 Posts
8 Posts
132 Posts dating from May 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Joy Grunenwald
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]