Craig Hill
KC Hill
Paladin
Oracle of DelphiDamages For A Risk Of Injury Where Damages Already Paid
January 3rd 2009 09:09
In Muscat v Comcare [2008] AATA 872, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered whether an employee was entitled to compensation under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRC Act) in circumstances where he had settled an action for damages against the Commonwealth in the Dust Diseases Tribunal of NSW (DDT).
In making its decision, the AAT looked at the nature of the settlement of the damages action and considered the concept of 'injury' for the purposes of the SRC Act.
Read more...
In making its decision, the AAT looked at the nature of the settlement of the damages action and considered the concept of 'injury' for the purposes of the SRC Act.
Read more...
| 208 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Content on this site is written and mediated by Craig Hill
Go to Craig Hill's home page for information about corporate training courses, university preparation courses and writing services available
Go to Craig Hill's home page for information about corporate training courses, university preparation courses and writing services available
